trust-{free, minimized} technologies
Research on where protocol formalization leaves judgment, operation, and institutional responsibility.
Scope
The programme studies systems that reduce or discipline reliance on discretionary intermediaries through protocol rules, cryptographic verification, and distributed coordination. Its central question is Residual Authority After Formalization. Adjacent cases, wider blockchain studies, and work on public institutions remain analytically distinct.
Adjacent cases
Institutional boundary cases
Cases that extend the programme's central question into further institutional domains.
Related studies
Wider blockchain studies
Studies outside the primary claim set, grouped by shared methods of code, legal, and institutional analysis.
Automaticgovernance study
A block-pinned map places legacy owners alongside Protocol Council infrastructure, governance proposals, and staked-POL signaling.
Out of Scopecredibility study
The former market-causation thesis is withdrawn. The reconstruction separates what Sui's papers prove, its benchmarks measure, its source permits, and its deployment and governance records show.
Race Conditionmetric-capture study
Repository continuity and incentive-funded activity place Sei's shifting technical narratives and adoption metrics under a shared evidentiary test.
Unstableclassification study
Payment measurement requires an attribution bridge from stablecoin transfers to economic purpose.
Gnot Quitecode-audit study
Gno's Go-compatibility claim is tested across source, consensus execution, authority, gas, storage, and runtime continuity.
To No Availdata-availability study
The substitution thesis is withdrawn. The surviving record establishes selected protocol capabilities while leaving deployment, demand, pricing, and category-level substitution unproved.
Undertonelegal-form study
The former regulatory-form-substitution thesis is withdrawn. The reconstruction defines the evidence needed to distinguish continuity of artefacts from continuity of institutions.
Public institutions and infrastructure
Public administration, energy infrastructure, accountability, and institutional design work with its own publication path, connected to the blockchain package through a shared concern with institutional form.
Visible Is Not Yet VerifiableCanadian public administration
An evidence audit withdraws the comparative accountability scores and policy recommendation, corrects a duplicated-aggregate error, and specifies the conditions for a supportable comparison.
When Can Bitcoin Mining Count as Circular Energy Policy?Bitcoin mining and provincial energy policy
A source-frozen institutional test separates operative law from proposals and requires auditable evidence for curtailment, useful heat, emissions, and ratepayer risk.