trust-{free, minimized} technologies

Research on where protocol formalization leaves judgment, operation, and institutional responsibility.

Scope

The programme studies systems that reduce or discipline reliance on discretionary intermediaries through protocol rules, cryptographic verification, and distributed coordination. Its central question is Residual Authority After Formalization. Adjacent cases, wider blockchain studies, and work on public institutions remain analytically distinct.

Adjacent cases

Institutional boundary cases

Cases that extend the programme's central question into further institutional domains.

Cases

  • AtonementCosmos: sovereignty and institutional maintenance

    Selected Cosmos episodes trace relayer, reporting, maintenance, and security-provider work around protocol operation.

  • Reconnecting the DotsPolkadot: protocol transition

    Designer optionality identifies the asymmetry between participant commitment and institutional flexibility across Polkadot's protocol transitions.

  • EtherealEthereum: infrastructure dependence

    A participant-relative dependency graph traces when Ethereum's protocol-adjacent operators become decision-bearing.

  • After MidnightMidnight: privacy architecture

    A source-level analysis follows Compact, proof generation, key custody, maintenance authority, consensus, governance, and the Cardano bridge.

Related studies

Wider blockchain studies

Studies outside the primary claim set, grouped by shared methods of code, legal, and institutional analysis.

Blockchain studies

  • Automaticgovernance study

    A block-pinned map places legacy owners alongside Protocol Council infrastructure, governance proposals, and staked-POL signaling.

  • Out of Scopecredibility study

    The former market-causation thesis is withdrawn. The reconstruction separates what Sui's papers prove, its benchmarks measure, its source permits, and its deployment and governance records show.

  • Race Conditionmetric-capture study

    Repository continuity and incentive-funded activity place Sei's shifting technical narratives and adoption metrics under a shared evidentiary test.

  • Unstableclassification study

    Payment measurement requires an attribution bridge from stablecoin transfers to economic purpose.

  • Gnot Quitecode-audit study

    Gno's Go-compatibility claim is tested across source, consensus execution, authority, gas, storage, and runtime continuity.

  • To No Availdata-availability study

    The substitution thesis is withdrawn. The surviving record establishes selected protocol capabilities while leaving deployment, demand, pricing, and category-level substitution unproved.

  • Undertonelegal-form study

    The former regulatory-form-substitution thesis is withdrawn. The reconstruction defines the evidence needed to distinguish continuity of artefacts from continuity of institutions.

Public institutions and infrastructure

Public administration, energy infrastructure, accountability, and institutional design work with its own publication path, connected to the blockchain package through a shared concern with institutional form.

  • Visible Is Not Yet VerifiableCanadian public administration

    An evidence audit withdraws the comparative accountability scores and policy recommendation, corrects a duplicated-aggregate error, and specifies the conditions for a supportable comparison.

  • When Can Bitcoin Mining Count as Circular Energy Policy?Bitcoin mining and provincial energy policy

    A source-frozen institutional test separates operative law from proposals and requires auditable evidence for curtailment, useful heat, emissions, and ratepayer risk.

Available for reading as a working draft.